03 December 2006

On Pan's Labyrinth

Oh, the wind, the wind is blowing,
through the graves the wind is blowing,
freedom soon will come;
then we'll come from the shadows.
- Leonard Cohen

I don't know why the English title of this film is Pan's Labyrinth. The Spanish title translates as The Labyrinth of the Faun, and the faun character is actually asked his name in the film, replying that he has many names that only the trees can pronounce. From then on, he's just referred to as "the faun". If he'd added "And my name definitely isn't Pan, so don't go erroneously naming any English translations after Greek gods", it wouldn't have been much clearer. But go and see it anyway, because it's brilliant.

It's hard not to compare it with the 1986 film Labyrinth: a girl who's obsessed with fairy tales finds a way into a magical world, where she's given a quest. But Pan's Labyrinth is more complex than Jim Henson's one. The older film is a straight allegory on the lines of Alice in Wonderland. As Jennifer Connelly's character makes her way through the maze, solving puzzles and defeating monsters, she learns growing-up lessons like "Life isn't fair" and "Material possessions are junk". Ofelia, the central character in the Spanish film, is younger and more flawed, and so's the world she lives in (Spain in 1944). It's much harder with this film to sum up the relationship between the real world and the magical one. For a start, the focus is on the former, which is unusual. Sometimes, when Ofelia is in the fantasy, she does find analogues to her real-world problems as in Labyrinth, but that doesn't mean she ends up solving them. It may be that she shouldn't be hiding among imaginary shadows, but actively helping her ill mother or the freedom fighters who are hiding in the hills - but on the other hand, what can a little girl do? Where Jennifer Connelly makes lots of muppety friends, Ofelia's only ally is the faun himself, a towering, hissing creature who reminded me of the rabbit in Donnie Darko and whose motives are questioned throughout.

Is Pan's Labyrinth a children's film? Well, it's got Franco's soldiers torturing republicans, and a nasty bit where someone sews up a wound in his own cheek, but I'd say it is, yes. Spain's politics may be complex, but Ofelia's view of the adults around her is simple, and so that's how we see them too. When she timidly stretches out her left hand to greet her new stepfather for the first time, his own right one snaps up in its fascist black glove and grabs her arm. He whispers "It's the other hand, Ofelia," before walking smartly off. Ah, thinks the audience, fine: this must be a baddy. I'd put the film in the same sort of tradition as Philip Pulman's His Dark Materials novels: since Jim Henson's day, fiction's discovered that children can cope with darkness and pain so long as the morality is easy to understand. That doesn't mean they're preachy, mind. It just means the characters' decisions come in the form of stark moral dilemmas rather than shades of grey.

But watch the film for its atmosphere. There's this sad tune that returns throughout. I suppose it's in a minor key or something. Anyway, it's gorgeous, and it does the same kind of job as the Godfather theme. And the visuals are beautifully terrifying. Have you ever seen Goya's painting of Saturn eating his own son? Well, there's a version of that here, but it's much better.

Is there anything wrong with Pan's Labyrinth? Yes. Given Ofelia's character, there's no way she would have eaten the grapes.

4 comments:

joe baker said...

I read something interesting the other day.

"Like the fumes of the automobile and of heavy industry which befoul the urban atmosphere, the effusion of interpretations of art today poisons our sensibilities. In a culture whose already classical dilemma is the hypertrophy of the intellect at the expense of energy and sensual capability, interpretation is the revenge of the intellect upon art."
- Susan Sontag, 'Against Interpretation', 1964

Ishbel said...

There is absolutely no way on earth, in hell and under heaven that Pan's Labyrinth is a children's film. How the BBFC call it a 15 is a mystery to me. Don't get me wrong, I saw it last night and thought it was a fantasically original film despite the references to other works (be it Henson or Ovid). It was a wonderful film but I feel that the 'fantasy' label is utterly misleading. Utterly. It did succeed in that it provoked a stronger reaction in me than any other film ever has but the violence and cruelty were just so horrific. There is violence in Mission Impossible et al but not the cruelty, which was by far the worst of it for me. It's interesting that you highlighted the sewing of the mouth, because I found that much easier to deal with than other parts. It was the torture-victim and the scene with the bludgenging(sp?) someone to death in the face. I know I'm an absolute wimp, but my whole party was distressed and impressed. That should have been the tagline 'The Labyrinth of the Faun: Will leave you impressed and distressed'.

Anonymous said...

HEY! X
have to say i LOVE pans labyrinth - just cudnt wait for it to come out on DVD after seeing it at the cinemas. Is very orignal fantasy film as isnt exactly a childrens film! must admit did a nightmare or two bout the pale man - child eater! lol. But is a fantastic film. And i love the faun! (pan - if that is his name?) hes just brilliant. wish he were my friend haha.

Astrofilia said...

Actually, the director gives an explanation for the grapes in the commentary; Ofelia had not eaten since the day before, with her mother not allowing her any dinner, and then the calamity of the next day.